AI UGC GENERATOR COMPARISON SCORECARD
Published by FireplaceUGC | Version: 2026-10-01
Method: https://fireplaceugc.com/guides/compare-ai-ugc-generators
Free to copy and adapt. No signup required.
This is an empty worksheet, not measured results or a tool ranking.

1. FIX THE BRIEF BEFORE TESTING
Test date:
Reviewer / relationship to vendors:
Product and permission to use its assets:
Audience:
Supportable benefit:
Exact script and CTA:
Reference image or demo recording:
Workflow: product in hand / app demo / hook variations
Aspect ratio / target duration / output requirements:
Attempt cap per tool:
Pass/fail requirements:
Budget and subscription-cost allocation method:

2. COPY THIS BLOCK FOR EVERY ATTEMPT, INCLUDING FAILURES
Tool / plan / model / settings:
Attempt ID:
Start time / export time / hands-on editing minutes:
Credits charged / refunded:
Allocated money cost / currency:
Output location:
Pass or fail:
Reason (product identity, claims, audio, visual defects):
Reviewer identity:
Was the reviewer blind to the tool? If not, why?
For passing clips, score 1-5:
  Product accuracy:
  Presenter delivery:
  Audio:
  Visual continuity:
  Editing readiness:
Anchors: 1 = unusable; 3 = usable with corrections; 5 = ready under this brief.
Notes / limitations:

3. SUMMARY PER TOOL
All attempts:
Accepted exports:
Usable-output rate = accepted exports / all attempts:
Total allocated cost (include charged retries and add-ons):
Cost per usable export = allocated cost / accepted exports:
If accepted exports = 0, write 'no usable output' and report spend.
Actual subscription invoice and unused credit balance:
Total hands-on time and elapsed time:
Unsupported workflows (do not silently substitute another task):
What the tool did well:
Where another tool was a better fit:

4. BEFORE SHARING
Include the brief, settings, attempts, criteria and representative failures.
Disclose vendor involvement, sponsorships and affiliate links.
Label synthetic presenters and use assets you have permission to share.
Separate illustrative calculations from measured outcomes.
Production quality does not demonstrate CPA, ROAS or conversion improvement.
Small samples are exploratory; do not turn them into universal rankings.

5. OPTIONAL SEPARATE CAMPAIGN TEST
Hypothesis / audience / allocation method:
Primary outcome and measurement source:
Budget / start / end / decision rule:
Results / sample size / uncertainty:
What can and cannot be concluded: